Federal judge again sides with Congressmen Crow, Neguse in allowing unannounced inspections of ICE facilities

Seth Klamann, The Denver Post on Feb 2, 2026

By clicking submit, I authorize Arcamax and its affiliates to: (1) use, sell, and share my information for marketing purposes, including cross-context behavioral advertising, as described in our Privacy Policy , (2) add to information that I provide with other information like interests inferred from web page views, or data lawfully obtained from data brokers, such as past purchase or location data, or publicly available data, (3) contact me or enable others to contact me by email or other means with offers for different types of goods and services, and (4) retain my information while I am engaging with marketing messages that I receive and for a reasonable amount of time thereafter. I understand I can opt out at any time through an email that I receive, or by clicking here

A federal judge again ordered authorities to grant two Colorado congressmen and their colleagues unannounced access to immigration detention centers Monday.

The ruling is the latest blow to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s monthslong effort to slow congressional oversight of the facilities.

The temporary restraining order applied by U.S. District Court Judge Jia M. Cobb will once again allow members of Congress to access detention centers — like the one in Aurora — without prior notice to Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials.

“The court’s decision today to grant a temporary restraining order against ICE’s unlawful effort to obstruct congressional oversight is a victory for the American people,” U.S. Rep. Joe Neguse, of Boulder, said in a statement.

Neguse filed the lawsuit with a dozen other Democratic lawmakers, including fellow Coloradan U.S. Rep. Jason Crow.

The lawmakers initially sued last summer, after ICE blocked Crow, Neguse and other legislators from visiting the facilities.

The agency instituted a policy requiring seven days’ notice for conducting the visits, a requirement that appeared to violate a federal law allowing unannounced inspections. After Cobb temporarily blocked that policy in December, ICE instituted another in January, arguing the new policy required a different funding source that wasn’t bound by the provision in law allowing for the visits.

In her ruling Monday, Cobb appeared unconvinced by that argument. She noted her previous ruling, when she’d written that lawmakers faced “irreparable harm” if they were denied access to the facilities.

“If anything, the strength of that finding has become greater over the intervening weeks,” Cobb wrote in Monday’s order, “given that ICE’s enforcement and detention practices have become the focus of intense national and congressional interest.”

The order is temporary while the broader lawsuit plays out; Cobb wrote that it will expire in two weeks, unless the court intervenes.

_____