Politics

/

ArcaMax

Editorial: Illinois moves the goalposts on reading, math and science

The Editorial Board, Chicago Tribune on

Published in Op Eds

The return of school has us focused on education, and with that in mind we believe it’s worth weighing in on two major changes in the way the state of Illinois measures proficiency in reading, math and science.

First, the scores needed to be considered “proficient” are going down for math and reading.

For high schoolers, these scores come from the preACT and the ACT, a test with scores ranging from 1 at the low end to 36 on the high end.

Previously, the state used SAT scores to measure high school proficiency, with proficiency standards above the national average.

Now, scoring an 18 in English language arts and a 19 in math on the ACT will count as “proficient” for high school juniors. To put that in perspective: an 18 is below the national average ACT score of 19 — and far below what selective universities such as the University of Illinois expect, where most freshmen scored between 30 and 34.

For students in lower grades, the same trend holds true — proficiency scores based on the Illinois Assessment of Readiness for English and math went down, while science went up slightly.

Second, it’s about to become a lot more difficult to understand how students are doing.

Education reporter Becky Vevea of Chalkbeat hit the nail on the head when she wrote that, “Comparisons to achievement in past years, including to pre-pandemic performance, now will be difficult due to the shifting benchmarks.”

Yes. And while state officials make the case that this was a necessary change, we wonder cynically whether this move was about obfuscating continued declines.

The Illinois State Board of Education spun the move this way: “Illinois right-sizes assessment performance levels to give families and educators more accurate data on student success.”

But the state’s attempt to “right-size” expectations comes against the backdrop of already troubling results.

 

In 2024, just 30% of fourth graders across Illinois were proficient in reading, according to the Nation’s Report Card.

No matter the reason, the reality is we’re not going to be able to easily measure how well kids are reading and doing math compared with previous school years. That’s a problem when proficiency isn’t where it needs to be.

We’re cheering for students and teachers across Illinois this school year. We know life in the classroom is tough for kids and adults alike, and the process of learning is hard work. But it’s worth it — the rewards of being able to read and enjoy great books and perform challenging calculations on your own are great. This knowledge gives kids power and agency, two things they’ll need after graduation.

Now is not the time to move the goalposts on test scores. It’s time to get serious about what these scores are telling us — essentially, that many of our kids need our help.

Lowering expectations also won’t inspire better outcomes. On the contrary, it risks misleading parents and denying the very students who need help the support they deserve.

Under these lowered thresholds, more kids will be considered proficient in reading and math than last year. That’s good for administrators who want to pad their own grades.

But it doesn’t serve anyone else.

The point of the tests isn’t just to pass by any means necessary, even if that means making it easier to do so. The point is to be honest with parents and the people tasked with running our schools about how the system is doing.

_____


©2025 Chicago Tribune. Visit chicagotribune.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Related Channels

The ACLU

ACLU

By The ACLU
Amy Goodman

Amy Goodman

By Amy Goodman
Armstrong Williams

Armstrong Williams

By Armstrong Williams
Austin Bay

Austin Bay

By Austin Bay
Ben Shapiro

Ben Shapiro

By Ben Shapiro
Betsy McCaughey

Betsy McCaughey

By Betsy McCaughey
Bill Press

Bill Press

By Bill Press
Bonnie Jean Feldkamp

Bonnie Jean Feldkamp

By Bonnie Jean Feldkamp
Cal Thomas

Cal Thomas

By Cal Thomas
Christine Flowers

Christine Flowers

By Christine Flowers
Clarence Page

Clarence Page

By Clarence Page
Danny Tyree

Danny Tyree

By Danny Tyree
David Harsanyi

David Harsanyi

By David Harsanyi
Debra Saunders

Debra Saunders

By Debra Saunders
Dennis Prager

Dennis Prager

By Dennis Prager
Dick Polman

Dick Polman

By Dick Polman
Erick Erickson

Erick Erickson

By Erick Erickson
Froma Harrop

Froma Harrop

By Froma Harrop
Jacob Sullum

Jacob Sullum

By Jacob Sullum
Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Stiehm

By Jamie Stiehm
Jeff Robbins

Jeff Robbins

By Jeff Robbins
Jessica Johnson

Jessica Johnson

By Jessica Johnson
Jim Hightower

Jim Hightower

By Jim Hightower
Joe Conason

Joe Conason

By Joe Conason
Joe Guzzardi

Joe Guzzardi

By Joe Guzzardi
John Stossel

John Stossel

By John Stossel
Josh Hammer

Josh Hammer

By Josh Hammer
Judge Andrew P. Napolitano

Judge Andrew Napolitano

By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
Laura Hollis

Laura Hollis

By Laura Hollis
Marc Munroe Dion

Marc Munroe Dion

By Marc Munroe Dion
Michael Barone

Michael Barone

By Michael Barone
Mona Charen

Mona Charen

By Mona Charen
Rachel Marsden

Rachel Marsden

By Rachel Marsden
Rich Lowry

Rich Lowry

By Rich Lowry
Robert B. Reich

Robert B. Reich

By Robert B. Reich
Ruben Navarrett Jr.

Ruben Navarrett Jr

By Ruben Navarrett Jr.
Ruth Marcus

Ruth Marcus

By Ruth Marcus
S.E. Cupp

S.E. Cupp

By S.E. Cupp
Salena Zito

Salena Zito

By Salena Zito
Star Parker

Star Parker

By Star Parker
Stephen Moore

Stephen Moore

By Stephen Moore
Susan Estrich

Susan Estrich

By Susan Estrich
Ted Rall

Ted Rall

By Ted Rall
Terence P. Jeffrey

Terence P. Jeffrey

By Terence P. Jeffrey
Tim Graham

Tim Graham

By Tim Graham
Tom Purcell

Tom Purcell

By Tom Purcell
Veronique de Rugy

Veronique de Rugy

By Veronique de Rugy
Victor Joecks

Victor Joecks

By Victor Joecks
Wayne Allyn Root

Wayne Allyn Root

By Wayne Allyn Root

Comics

Scott Stantis Bart van Leeuwen Drew Sheneman John Branch Marshall Ramsey Lisa Benson